Исследовательский потенациал молодых ученых: взгляд в будущее - 2022

65 2. Ушаков Д. Н. Толковый словарь современного русского языка. – М. : Аде- лант, 2014. 3. Fauconnier G. and Turner M. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. – N.Y. : Basic Books, 2002. 4. Johansson Falck M. and Gibbs, R. W. Jr. Embodied motivations for metaphor- ical meanings // Cognitive Linguistics. – 2012. – 23(2). – С. 251–272. 5. Kirschenbaum M. G. What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? // M. Terras, J. Nyhan and E. Vanhoutte (eds.). Defining digital human- ities: A reader. – Farnham : Ashgate, 2013. – Р. 195–204. 6. McEnery T. and Hardie A. Corpus linguistics: Methods, theory and practice. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 7. Rieder B. and Röhle T. Digital methods: Five challenges // D. M. Berry (ed.). Understanding the digital humanities. – Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. – Р. 67–84. 8. Skorczynska H. and Deignan A. A comparison of metaphor vehicles and func- tions in scientific and popular business corpora // Metaphor and Symb. – 2006. – 21(2). – Р. 87–104. 9. Terras M. A decade in digital humanities // Humanities & Social Sciences : Journal of Siberian Federal University. – 2016. – № 7. – Р. 1637–1659.