ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В ФИЗИЧЕСКОМ ВОСТИТАНИИ И СПОРТЕ

359 r = 0903 (P < 0,01) have highly significant correlation. It responses the CBA playoffs each team's attack ability is generally increased in the game, the game's offense is done relatively well, attack ability has relatively large impact on the team's victory. And r = 0,619, (P > 0,05) defense RSR ability value, more em- bodies the CBA playoffs at present. All the team's defensive ability is generally low, efficient offensive capability and inefficient defensive ability makes a lot of team result not ideal, especially in the playoffs by opponents 3-0 swept out of the team. The reason for this mostly is because of their defensive level is too low, under the situation of the CBA playoffs cutthroat. Therefore, powerful of- fensive and solid defense is the key to winning. 3. Conclusion 3.1. Eight playoff teams in terms of attack, attack of the Beijing and Liaon- ing RSR values both is 0,82 belonging to A level attack level; Qingdao, Guang- dong, Shanxi attack RSR values is between 0,60 ~ 0,78 attack and belongs to the class B level; Jilin, Dongguan, Guangsha attack RSR values between 0,52 ~ 0,58 and belongs to the C level. 8 teams offensive capability and comprehensive offensive and defensive ability line has correlation coefficient R = 0,859 (P < 0,01), and the playoffs achievements rank correlation coefficient is R = 0,903 (P < 0,01), the three has highly significant correlation. 3.2. Eight playoff teams in the defensive aspect, Beijing and Guangdong teams defensive ability RSR values were 0,88 and 0,83, belonging to A grade level. Liaoning and Zhejiang teams defensive ability RSR values were 0,65 and 0,60, belonging to the class B level of defense. Jilin, Qingdao, Dongguan defensive RSR values were between 0,40 ~ 0,45, belonging to class C defense level. Defen- sive ability of Shanxi RSR value was 0,30, belonging to D level. Defensive ability have dominated the sort and comprehensive ability phase relation R = 0,881 (P < 0,01) both show significant correlation. 8 teams defensive ability of the sort and the playoffs scores rank correlation coefficient R = 0,619 (P > 0,05), both of them do not show significant correlation. It also shows that eight playoff teams (ex- cept the two Asia champion teams) playoffs defensive ability is generally low. 3.3. Eight playoff teams attack and comprehensive ability, comprehensive ability of attack and defense is: Beijing and Liaoning RSR values are higher than 0,8 belonging to A grade level; Guangdong offensive and defensive com- prehensive ability value is 0,75, belongs to the class B level; Qingdao and Zheji- ang teams comprehensive ability of attack and defense values are 0,56 and 0,50, belongs to the C level; Jilin, Shanxi and Dongguan comprehensive ability of at- tack and defense RSR values are between 0,25 ~ 0,32, belonging to the D de- fense level. 8 teams comprehensive ability and the team's offensive and defen- sive playoff performance rank correlation coefficient is R = 0,786 (P < 0,05), both are significantly related, which indicates that comprehensive ability of at- tack and defense of playoff team RSR values can objectively show reaction abi l- ity of attack and defense of playoff teams. 3.4. Finalist teams Liaoning and Beijing comparison shows, that the offense in addition to free throw with offensive rebounds, the rest are lagging behind the